↓ Skip to main content

Social Skills Interventions for Individuals with Autism: Evaluation for Evidence-Based Practices within a Best Evidence Synthesis Framework

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
496 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
618 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Social Skills Interventions for Individuals with Autism: Evaluation for Evidence-Based Practices within a Best Evidence Synthesis Framework
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10803-009-0842-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Reichow, Fred R. Volkmar

Abstract

This paper presents a best evidence synthesis of interventions to increase social behavior for individuals with autism. Sixty-six studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 2001 and July 2008 with 513 participants were included. The results are presented by the age of the individual receiving intervention and by delivery agent of intervention. The findings suggest there is much empirical evidence supporting many different treatments for the social deficits of individuals with autism. Using the criteria of evidence-based practice proposed by Reichow et al. (Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38:1311-1318, 2008), social skills groups and video modeling have accumulated the evidence necessary for the classifications of established EBP and promising EBP, respectively. Recommendations for practice and areas of future research are provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 618 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 <1%
United States 6 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 601 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 147 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 60 10%
Student > Bachelor 54 9%
Researcher 50 8%
Other 94 15%
Unknown 104 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 225 36%
Social Sciences 120 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 5%
Arts and Humanities 23 4%
Other 66 11%
Unknown 118 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,108,206
of 24,917,903 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,325
of 5,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,704
of 117,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,917,903 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.