↓ Skip to main content

Effects of nematodes, fungi and bacteria on the growth of young apple trees grown in apple replant disease soil

Overview of attention for article published in Plant and Soil, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Effects of nematodes, fungi and bacteria on the growth of young apple trees grown in apple replant disease soil
Published in
Plant and Soil, January 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00012835
Authors

R. S. Utkhede, T. C. Vrain, J. M. Yorston

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Chemistry 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#879
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,045
of 63,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.