↓ Skip to main content

Personalizing the Approach to Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Histology-specific Patterns of Failure and Postrelapse Outcome after Primary Extended Resection

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Personalizing the Approach to Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Histology-specific Patterns of Failure and Postrelapse Outcome after Primary Extended Resection
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, October 2014
DOI 10.1245/s10434-014-4130-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Gronchi, Rosalba Miceli, Marc Antoine Allard, Dario Callegaro, Cecile Le Péchoux, Marco Fiore, Charles Honoré, Roberta Sanfilippo, Sara Coppola, Silvia Stacchiotti, Philippe Terrier, Paolo G. Casali, Axel Le Cesne, Luigi Mariani, Chiara Colombo, Sylvie Bonvalot

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 34 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2016.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,172
of 7,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,848
of 270,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#70
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.