↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial-directed enzyme prodrug therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Controlled Release, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bacterial-directed enzyme prodrug therapy
Published in
Journal of Controlled Release, May 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.05.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panos Lehouritis, Caroline Springer, Mark Tangney

Abstract

Current conventional treatments for cancer lack tumour selectivity resulting in the destruction of healthy tissue and severe adverse effects to the patient in addition to limiting the administration dose and efficacy. Hence, it is imperative that we seek alternative approaches to treat cancer that localise therapeutic agents to the site of the tumour and spare normal tissue. The use of bacteria in cancer therapy represents one such approach. Bacteria were first used as anti-cancer agents over a century ago. Today, this field has re-emerged from the past and is progressing at a rapid rate. Bacteria are used as anticancer agents either alone or in combination with conventional treatments and have been armed with an arsenal of therapeutic genes, which enhance their efficacy. Bacterial directed enzyme prodrug therapy (BDEPT) is one of the most promising approaches, which harnesses the tumour-specific location of bacteria to locally activate systemically administered 'prodrugs' within the tumour in order to induce selective tumour destruction. BDEPT is a relatively new concept. It was originally conceived more than 10years ago but it is only until recently that we witness a surge in activity in this field. In this review, we provide a full account of developments in the field of BDEPT since its inception. We share technical knowhow and discuss optimization strategies for vector and enzyme combinations, provide a clear view of the research landscape and suggest possible directions for the field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 16%
Chemistry 19 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 21 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,222,087
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Controlled Release
#755
of 9,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,952
of 208,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Controlled Release
#10
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.