↓ Skip to main content

Microplastics in Sewage Sludge: Effects of Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
25 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
689 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microplastics in Sewage Sludge: Effects of Treatment
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, December 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b04048
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. M. Mahon, B. O’Connell, M. G. Healy, I. O’Connor, R. Officer, R. Nash, L. Morrison

Abstract

Waste water treatment plants (WWTPs) are receptors for the cumulative loading of microplastics (MPs) derived from industry, landfill, domestic wastewater and stormwater. The partitioning of MPs through the settlement processes of wastewater treatment results in the majority becoming entrained in the sewage sludge. This study characterized MPs in sludge samples from seven WWTPs in Ireland which use anaerobic digestion (AD), thermal drying (TD), or lime stabilization (LS) treatment processes. Abundances ranged from 4196 to 15 385 particles kg(-1) (dry weight). Results of a general linear mixed model (GLMM) showed significantly higher abundances of MPs in smaller size classes in the LS samples, suggesting that the treatment process of LS shears MP particles. In contrast, lower abundances of MPs found in the AD samples suggests that this process may reduce MP abundances. Surface morphologies examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed characteristics of melting and blistering of TD MPs and shredding and flaking of LS MPs. This study highlights the potential for sewage sludge treatment processes to affect the risk of MP pollution prior to land spreading and may have implications for legislation governing the application of biosolids to agricultural land.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 1106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 196 18%
Student > Master 151 14%
Student > Bachelor 125 11%
Researcher 113 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 4%
Other 129 12%
Unknown 349 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 261 24%
Engineering 106 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 9%
Chemistry 67 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 3%
Other 114 10%
Unknown 433 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#472,642
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#691
of 21,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,812
of 429,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#13
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.