| Title |
Population regulation of Serengeti Wildebeeest: a test of the food hypothesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, January 1985
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00379227 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. R. E. Sinclair, H. Dublin, Markus Borner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 22% |
| Researcher | 27 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2011.
All research outputs
#5,680,563
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,170
of 4,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,222
of 38,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.