| Title |
A supplementary contribution of ants in the pollination of an orchid, Epipactis thunbergii, usually pollinated by hover flies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Systematics and Evolution, February 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00606-005-0391-8 |
| Authors |
N. Sugiura, S. Miyazaki, S. Nagaishi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,331,154
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#117
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,848
of 71,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.