↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of climate-driven change in continental water storage to recent sea-level rise

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contribution of climate-driven change in continental water storage to recent sea-level rise
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2003
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2134014100
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. C. D. Milly, A. Cazenave, C. Gennero

Abstract

Using a global model of continental water balance, forced by interannual variations in precipitation and near-surface atmospheric temperature for the period 1981-1998, we estimate the sea-level changes associated with climate-driven changes in storage of water as snowpack, soil water, and ground water; storage in ice sheets and large lakes is not considered. The 1981-1998 trend is estimated to be 0.12 mm/yr, and substantial interannual fluctuations are inferred; for 1993-1998, the trend is 0.25 mm/yr. At the decadal time scale, the terrestrial contribution to eustatic (i.e., induced by mass exchange) sea-level rise is significantly smaller than the estimated steric (i.e., induced by density changes) trend for the same period, but is not negligibly small. In the model the sea-level rise is driven mainly by a downtrend in continental precipitation during the study period, which we believe was generated by natural variability in the climate system.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 81 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Master 11 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 11%
Professor 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 2 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 43 51%
Environmental Science 16 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Engineering 7 8%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 9 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2015.
All research outputs
#2,694,176
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#30,008
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,563
of 56,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#60
of 511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.