↓ Skip to main content

Preliminary peak stage and streamflow data at selected stream-gaging stations in North Carolina and South Carolina for flooding following Hurricane Matthew, October 2016

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preliminary peak stage and streamflow data at selected stream-gaging stations in North Carolina and South Carolina for flooding following Hurricane Matthew, October 2016
Published in
US Geological Survey, December 2016
DOI 10.3133/ofr20161205
Authors

J. Curtis Weaver, Toby D. Feaster, Jeanne C. Robbins, Weaver, J. Curtis, Feaster, Toby D., Robbins, Jeanne C.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Professor 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 20%
Engineering 2 20%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2016.
All research outputs
#14,436,126
of 25,312,451 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#1,146
of 2,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,605
of 433,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#143
of 395 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,312,451 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 395 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.