| Title |
Microanatomy of the subcallosal artery: an in-vivo 7 T magnetic resonance angiography study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-015-4117-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Toshinori Matsushige, Bixia Chen, Philipp Dammann, Sören Johst, Harald H. Quick, Mark E. Ladd, Michael Forsting, Ulrich Sure, Karsten H. Wrede |
| Abstract |
To investigate in-vivo microanatomy of the subcallosal artery branching from the anterior communicating artery (ACoA) using time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 7 Tesla. Seventy-five subjects, including 15 healthy volunteers and 60 patients, were included in this prospective study. Three raters characterized branches from ACoA in maximum intensity projections of TOF MRA at 7 Tesla acquired with 0.22 × 0.22 × 0.41 mm(3) resolution. Furthermore, course patterns and anatomical features of the subcallosal artery (maximum diameter, length, and branching angle from ACoA) were measured. Branches from the anterior communicating artery were visualized in 63 of 74 (85.1 %) subjects and were identified as the subcallosal artery (93.7 %) and the accessory anterior cerebral artery (6.3 %). The course of the subcallosal artery was classified into 3 groups; C-shaped (55.9 %), straight (16.9 %), and S-shaped (27.2 %). There was a significant difference between the branching angles of C-shaped and straight (p < 0.0001), between C-shaped and S-shaped (p < 0.0001), as well as between straight and S-shaped (p = 0.0113) course patterns. High-resolution in-vivo 7 T TOF MRA can delineate the microanatomy of the subcallosal artery. Three main variants of course patterns and branching angles from ACoA could be identified. • In-vivo 7 Tesla TOF MRA can delineate the subcallosal artery microanatomy • Three distinct course patterns of the subcallosal artery were identified • Branching angles from ACoA significantly differed between subcallosal artery course patterns. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
| Austria | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 40% |
| Other | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 40% |
| Engineering | 2 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2017.
All research outputs
#13,423,877
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,966
of 4,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,990
of 386,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#25
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.