You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incorporating uncertainty associated with habitat data in marine reserve design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.03.003 |
| Authors |
Vivitskaia J. Tulloch, Hugh P. Possingham, Stacy D. Jupiter, Chris Roelfsema, Ayesha I.T. Tulloch, Carissa J. Klein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Fiji | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Fiji | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 150 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 21% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 74 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 35% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,192,016
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#3,917
of 6,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,414
of 210,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#17
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.