↓ Skip to main content

Family Physicians’ Awareness and Knowledge of the Genetic Information Non‐Discrimination Act (GINA)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Family Physicians’ Awareness and Knowledge of the Genetic Information Non‐Discrimination Act (GINA)
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10897-011-9405-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda L. Laedtke, Suzanne M. O'Neill, Wendy S. Rubinstein, Kristen J. Vogel

Abstract

Historically, physicians have expressed concern about their patients' risk of genetic discrimination, which has acted as a barrier to uptake of genetic services. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) is intended to protect patients against employer and health insurance discrimination. Physicians' awareness and knowledge of GINA has yet to be evaluated. In 2009, we mailed surveys to 1500 randomly selected members of the American Academy of Family Physicians. Questions measured physicians' current knowledge of GINA and their level of concern for genetic discrimination. In total, 401 physicians completed the survey (response rate 26.9%). Approximately half (54.5%) of physicians had no awareness of GINA. Of physicians who reported basic knowledge of GINA, the majority were aware of the protections offered for group health insurance (92.7%), private health insurance (82.9%), and employment (70.7%). Fewer physicians were aware of GINA's limitations regarding life insurance (53.7%) and long-term care insurance (58.8%). Physicians demonstrated highest levels of concern for health insurance, life insurance, and long-term care insurance discrimination, with less concern for employer and family/social discrimination. Level of concern for the risk of genetic discrimination did not correlate significantly with awareness of GINA. Approximately 17 months after GINA was signed into federal law, physicians' knowledge remained limited regarding the existence of this legislation and relevant details. Physicians who are aware of GINA continue to have significant concerns regarding the risk of genetic discrimination. This study reveals the need to further educate physicians about the existence of GINA and the protections offered.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Other 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2013.
All research outputs
#3,528,860
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#180
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,405
of 125,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them