You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On the Differing Sensitivity to Chemical Gating of Single and Double Layer Epitaxial Graphene Explored Using Scanning Kelvin Probe Microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACS Nano, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1021/nn3052633 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth Pearce, Jens Eriksson, Tihomir Iakimov, Lars Hultman, Anita Lloyd Spetz, Rositza Yakimova |
| Abstract |
Using environmental scanning Kelvin probe microscopy, we show that the position of the Fermi level of single layer graphene is more sensitive to chemical gating than that of double layer graphene. We calculate that the difference in sensitivity to chemical gating is not entirely due to the difference in band structure of 1 and 2 layer graphene. The findings are important for gas sensing where the sensitivity of the electronic properties to gas adsorption is monitored and suggest that single layer graphene could make a more sensitive gas sensor than double layer graphene. We propose that the difference in surface potential between adsorbate-free single and double layer graphene, measured using scanning kelvin probe microscopy, can be used as a noninvasive method of estimating substrate-induced doping in epitaxial graphene. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 61 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 31% |
| Researcher | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 23 | 34% |
| Materials Science | 14 | 21% |
| Engineering | 7 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 10% |
| Energy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2013.
All research outputs
#3,886,323
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from ACS Nano
#3,643
of 12,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,721
of 196,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Nano
#87
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.