↓ Skip to main content

Epigenome-wide association study of body mass index, and the adverse outcomes of adiposity

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
696 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
754 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
917 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epigenome-wide association study of body mass index, and the adverse outcomes of adiposity
Published in
Nature, December 2016
DOI 10.1038/nature20784
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Wahl, Alexander Drong, Benjamin Lehne, Marie Loh, William R. Scott, Sonja Kunze, Pei-Chien Tsai, Janina S. Ried, Weihua Zhang, Youwen Yang, Sili Tan, Giovanni Fiorito, Lude Franke, Simonetta Guarrera, Silva Kasela, Jennifer Kriebel, Rebecca C. Richmond, Marco Adamo, Uzma Afzal, Mika Ala-Korpela, Benedetta Albetti, Ole Ammerpohl, Jane F. Apperley, Marian Beekman, Pier Alberto Bertazzi, S. Lucas Black, Christine Blancher, Marc-Jan Bonder, Mario Brosch, Maren Carstensen-Kirberg, Anton J. M. de Craen, Simon de Lusignan, Abbas Dehghan, Mohamed Elkalaawy, Krista Fischer, Oscar H. Franco, Tom R. Gaunt, Jochen Hampe, Majid Hashemi, Aaron Isaacs, Andrew Jenkinson, Sujeet Jha, Norihiro Kato, Vittorio Krogh, Michael Laffan, Christa Meisinger, Thomas Meitinger, Zuan Yu Mok, Valeria Motta, Hong Kiat Ng, Zacharoula Nikolakopoulou, Georgios Nteliopoulos, Salvatore Panico, Natalia Pervjakova, Holger Prokisch, Wolfgang Rathmann, Michael Roden, Federica Rota, Michelle Ann Rozario, Johanna K. Sandling, Clemens Schafmayer, Katharina Schramm, Reiner Siebert, P. Eline Slagboom, Pasi Soininen, Lisette Stolk, Konstantin Strauch, E-Shyong Tai, Letizia Tarantini, Barbara Thorand, Ettje F. Tigchelaar, Rosario Tumino, Andre G. Uitterlinden, Cornelia van Duijn, Joyce B. J. van Meurs, Paolo Vineis, Ananda Rajitha Wickremasinghe, Cisca Wijmenga, Tsun-Po Yang, Wei Yuan, Alexandra Zhernakova, Rachel L. Batterham, George Davey Smith, Panos Deloukas, Bastiaan T. Heijmans, Christian Herder, Albert Hofman, Cecilia M. Lindgren, Lili Milani, Pim van der Harst, Annette Peters, Thomas Illig, Caroline L. Relton, Melanie Waldenberger, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin, Valentina Bollati, Richie Soong, Tim D. Spector, James Scott, Mark I. McCarthy, Paul Elliott, Jordana T. Bell, Giuseppe Matullo, Christian Gieger, Jaspal S. Kooner, Harald Grallert, John C. Chambers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 696 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 917 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 902 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 185 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 173 19%
Student > Master 92 10%
Student > Bachelor 72 8%
Professor 48 5%
Other 164 18%
Unknown 183 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 230 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 155 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 146 16%
Computer Science 19 2%
Psychology 15 2%
Other 120 13%
Unknown 232 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 593. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#39,519
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,417
of 98,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#823
of 424,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#69
of 886 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 886 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.