| Title |
Factors determining authors’ willingness to wait for editorial decisions from economic history journals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-014-1469-2 |
| Authors |
Eline Poelmans, Sandra Rousseau |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 27% |
| Librarian | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 31% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 12% |
| Engineering | 3 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#5,909,704
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,083
of 2,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,653
of 262,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#11
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.