Title |
Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain control: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, November 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12630-010-9407-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Louise Vigneault, Alexis F. Turgeon, Dany Côté, François Lauzier, Ryan Zarychanski, Lynne Moore, Lauralyn A. McIntyre, Pierre C. Nicole, Dean A. Fergusson |
Abstract |
Various strategies have been proposed for postoperative pain control. Among those, intravenous lidocaine infusion (IVLI) has gained in interest. However, its clinical benefit remains unclear. This systematic review is an evaluation of the analgesic efficacy and safety of IVLI during general anesthesia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Germany | 1 | 9% |
South Africa | 1 | 9% |
Australia | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Curaçao | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 255 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 36 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 36 | 14% |
Researcher | 33 | 13% |
Student > Master | 25 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 10% |
Other | 59 | 23% |
Unknown | 48 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 163 | 62% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 6% |
Unknown | 57 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,798,581
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#219
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,570
of 111,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.