| Title |
Why do users like video?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), September 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00752437 |
| Authors |
John C. Tang, Ellen Isaacs |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 59 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 23 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 20% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Design | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2009.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#48
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,215
of 17,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them