| Title |
Biology and Functional Ecology of Equisetum with Emphasis on the Giant Horsetails
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Botanical Review, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12229-012-9113-4 |
| Authors |
Chad Husby |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,710,624
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#74
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,545
of 313,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.