Title |
Epidemiological studies on human subjects exposed to arsenic in drinking water in Southeast Hungary
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Toxicology, January 1992
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02307274 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
M. Börzsönyi, A. Bereczky, P. Rudnai, M. Csanady, A. Horvath |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 19 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 26% |
Student > Master | 5 | 22% |
Researcher | 5 | 22% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
Computer Science | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2007.
All research outputs
#2,812,063
of 25,101,232 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#199
of 2,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,661
of 62,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,101,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.