↓ Skip to main content

Carbon Nanotubes for Supercapacitor

Overview of attention for article published in Discover Nano, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
660 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
795 Mendeley
Title
Carbon Nanotubes for Supercapacitor
Published in
Discover Nano, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11671-009-9508-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Pan, Jianyi Li, YuanPing Feng

Abstract

As an electrical energy storage device, supercapacitor finds attractive applications in consumer electronic products and alternative power source due to its higher energy density, fast discharge/charge time, low level of heating, safety, long-term operation stability, and no disposable parts. This work reviews the recent development of supercapacitor based on carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and their composites. The purpose is to give a comprehensive understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of carbon nanotubes-related supercapacitor materials and to find ways for the improvement in the performance of supercapacitor. We first discussed the effects of physical and chemical properties of pure carbon nanotubes, including size, purity, defect, shape, functionalization, and annealing, on the supercapacitance. The composites, including CNTs/oxide and CNTs/polymer, were further discussed to enhance the supercapacitance and keep the stability of the supercapacitor by optimally engineering the composition, particle size, and coverage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 795 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Malaysia 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 773 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 187 24%
Student > Master 139 17%
Researcher 81 10%
Student > Bachelor 58 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 6%
Other 86 11%
Unknown 200 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 173 22%
Chemistry 141 18%
Engineering 100 13%
Physics and Astronomy 54 7%
Chemical Engineering 27 3%
Other 58 7%
Unknown 242 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#94
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,962
of 173,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them