Title |
Deforestation, climate change and sustainable nutrition security: A case study of India
|
---|---|
Published in |
Climatic Change, September 1991
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00142227 |
Authors |
S. K. Sinha, M. S. Swaminathan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 4 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
Researcher | 8 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 10 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 21% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 13% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 11% |
Engineering | 4 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,532,834
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#1,688
of 6,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#539
of 16,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.