| Title |
A Systematic Review of Business Incubation Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Technology Transfer, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:jott.0000011181.11952.0f |
| Authors |
Sean M. Hackett, David M. Dilts |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,084 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Portugal | 4 | <1% |
| Sweden | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1036 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 273 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 161 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 101 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 97 | 9% |
| Researcher | 65 | 6% |
| Other | 172 | 16% |
| Unknown | 215 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 484 | 45% |
| Social Sciences | 96 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 93 | 9% |
| Engineering | 47 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 39 | 4% |
| Other | 89 | 8% |
| Unknown | 236 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,329,965
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#22
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,079
of 143,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them