↓ Skip to main content

Economic incentives for conservation: beekeeping and Saturniidae caterpillar utilization by rural communities

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, September 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Economic incentives for conservation: beekeeping and Saturniidae caterpillar utilization by rural communities
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, September 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00695912
Authors

Simon M. Munthali, Daniel E. C. Mughogho

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 19 24%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 35%
Environmental Science 18 23%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,179
of 2,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,136
of 17,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them