↓ Skip to main content

Income and labour productivity of collection and use of indigenous fruit tree products in Zimbabwe

Overview of attention for article published in Agroforestry Systems, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Income and labour productivity of collection and use of indigenous fruit tree products in Zimbabwe
Published in
Agroforestry Systems, November 2003
DOI 10.1023/b:agfo.0000005230.09714.b4
Authors

Dagmar Mithöfer, Hermann Waibel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 22%
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 35%
Environmental Science 12 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 9%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2010.
All research outputs
#7,496,019
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Agroforestry Systems
#240
of 977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,041
of 52,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agroforestry Systems
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 977 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them