↓ Skip to main content

Improving vancomycin prescription in critical illness through a drug use evaluation process: a weight-based dosing intervention study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving vancomycin prescription in critical illness through a drug use evaluation process: a weight-based dosing intervention study
Published in
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, October 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.08.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janice Li, Andrew A. Udy, Carl M.J. Kirkpatrick, Jeffrey Lipman, Jason A. Roberts

Abstract

Vancomycin is currently recommended as first-line therapy for many meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Recent guidelines have advocated loading doses (25-30 mg/kg) in critically ill patients in order to achieve therapeutic concentrations rapidly. However, weight-based loading doses are still not widely practised. A drug use evaluation was performed to improve the appropriateness of vancomycin initial doses in a population of critically ill adults. An educational intervention incorporating a vancomycin dosing protocol was carried out. Data were collected pre and post intervention. Vancomycin exposure [area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)] in the first 24h was determined using serum concentrations and the Bayesian software TCIWorks. Initial vancomycin doses and exposures were compared between the pre- and post-intervention groups using χ(2) and Mann-Whitney tests. A total of 111 vancomycin courses were analysed in the pre-intervention (n=80) and post-intervention (n=31) groups. Patients in the post-intervention group had significantly higher median weight-based initial doses (20.0mg/kg vs. 12.5mg/kg; P<0.001) compared with the pre-intervention group. This corresponded to significantly higher median vancomycin exposures (366.0 mg h/L vs. 262.5 mg h/L; P<0.01) in the post-intervention group. Despite higher weight-based initial doses, only 32.3% of patients in the post-intervention group had achieved optimal vancomycin exposures (AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration ratio ≥400) in the first 24h of therapy. A vancomycin dosing protocol improved the initial dosing of vancomycin and the proportion of patients who rapidly achieved optimal vancomycin exposures. However, subtherapeutic exposures were still prevalent and may warrant more vigilant promotion of the dosing protocol to ensure that recommended vancomycin doses are used in this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 18%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 18%
Engineering 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
#2,125
of 3,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,637
of 151,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.