| Title |
Indicators for optical oxygen sensors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bioanalytical Reviews, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12566-012-0032-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michela Quaranta, Sergey M. Borisov, Ingo Klimant |
| Abstract |
Continuous monitoring of oxygen concentration is of great importance in many different areas of research which range from medical applications to food packaging. In the last three decades, significant progress has been made in the field of optical sensing technology and this review will highlight the one inherent to the development of oxygen indicators. The first section outlines the bioanalytical fields in which optical oxygen sensors have been applied. The second section gives the reader a comprehensive summary of the existing oxygen indicators with a critical highlight on their photophysical and sensing properties. Altogether, this review is meant to give the potential user a guide to select the most suitable oxygen indicator for the particular application of interest. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 441 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Poland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 420 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 114 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 15% |
| Researcher | 63 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 12% |
| Unknown | 83 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 103 | 23% |
| Engineering | 75 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 73 | 17% |
| Unknown | 106 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,879,404
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Bioanalytical Reviews
#2
of 10 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,113
of 276,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioanalytical Reviews
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them