↓ Skip to main content

Seeds of Corruption – Do Market Institutions Matter?

Overview of attention for article published in MOCT-MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Seeds of Corruption – Do Market Institutions Matter?
Published in
MOCT-MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies, December 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1015264312632
Authors

Harry G. Broadman, Francesca Recanatini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 28%
Student > Master 7 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 30%
Social Sciences 11 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 9%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from MOCT-MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies
#1
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,691
of 132,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MOCT-MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them