↓ Skip to main content

Master Resilience Training and Its Relationship to Individual Well-Being and Stress Buffering Among Army National Guard Soldiers

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 521)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
Title
Master Resilience Training and Its Relationship to Individual Well-Being and Stress Buffering Among Army National Guard Soldiers
Published in
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11414-013-9320-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Griffith, Courtney West

Abstract

To better enable soldiers to adapt to stressors of military life, Master Resilience Training has been offered to soldiers since 2009. Few studies have examined whether the training achieves its intended effects. To fill this gap, resilience-trained Army National Guard soldiers and civilians (N = 611) completed online questionnaires about their resilience training experience (72% completion rate, N = 441). Respondents (92% or more) indicated the training was helpful and improved resilience competencies that enhanced coping with stressful circumstances. Respondents (97% or more) indicated that these competencies were subsequently used in their military and civilian jobs. A measure of resilience competencies was developed and showed self-reported changes largely pertained to increased self-awareness and strength of character, including improved optimism, mental agility, and connection with others. Self-reported change in resilience competencies was associated with fewer behavioral health symptoms, especially, for those reporting more current stressful events (known as the buffering effect). Findings are discussed in terms of resilience's potency of training, content of the training, and the need to elaborate on resilience's relationship to specific stressors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 218 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 11%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 45 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 96 43%
Social Sciences 21 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 55 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,242,661
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#38
of 521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,926
of 200,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.