↓ Skip to main content

Giant Hawaiian Landslides

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Earth & Planetary Sciences, May 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
323 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Giant Hawaiian Landslides
Published in
Annual Review of Earth & Planetary Sciences, May 1994
DOI 10.1146/annurev.ea.22.050194.001003
Authors

James G. Moore, William R. Normark, Robin T. Holcomb

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
New Caledonia 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 87 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Master 11 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Professor 7 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 60 63%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Mathematics 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,239,707
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Earth & Planetary Sciences
#256
of 617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,610
of 20,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Earth & Planetary Sciences
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.