↓ Skip to main content

A political theory of intergovernmental grants

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, March 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
A political theory of intergovernmental grants
Published in
Public Choice, March 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf01047760
Authors

Philip J. Grossman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 20 25%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 38%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 26 32%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,929,527
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#130
of 1,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#447
of 21,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.