↓ Skip to main content

The diagnostic yield of whole-exome sequencing targeting a gene panel for hearing impairment in The Netherlands

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Human Genetics, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The diagnostic yield of whole-exome sequencing targeting a gene panel for hearing impairment in The Netherlands
Published in
European Journal of Human Genetics, December 2016
DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2016.182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celia Zazo Seco, Mieke Wesdorp, Ilse Feenstra, Rolph Pfundt, Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa, Stefan H Lelieveld, Steven Castelein, Christian Gilissen, Ilse J de Wijs, Ronald JC Admiraal, Ronald JE Pennings, Henricus PM Kunst, Jiddeke M van de Kamp, Saskia Tamminga, Arjan C Houweling, Astrid S Plomp, Saskia M Maas, Pia AM de Koning Gans, Sarina G Kant, Christa M de Geus, Suzanna GM Frints, Els K Vanhoutte, Marieke F van Dooren, Marie- José H van den Boogaard, Hans Scheffer, Marcel Nelen, Hannie Kremer, Lies Hoefsloot, Margit Schraders, Helger G Yntema

Abstract

Hearing impairment (HI) is genetically heterogeneous which hampers genetic counseling and molecular diagnosis. Testing of several single HI-related genes is laborious and expensive. In this study, we evaluate the diagnostic utility of whole-exome sequencing (WES) targeting a panel of HI-related genes. Two hundred index patients, mostly of Dutch origin, with presumed hereditary HI underwent WES followed by targeted analysis of an HI gene panel of 120 genes. We found causative variants underlying the HI in 67 of 200 patients (33.5%). Eight of these patients have a large homozygous deletion involving STRC, OTOA or USH2A, which could only be identified by copy number variation detection. Variants of uncertain significance were found in 10 patients (5.0%). In the remaining 123 cases, no potentially causative variants were detected (61.5%). In our patient cohort, causative variants in GJB2, USH2A, MYO15A and STRC, and in MYO6 were the leading causes for autosomal recessive and dominant HI, respectively. Segregation analysis and functional analyses of variants of uncertain significance will probably further increase the diagnostic yield of WES.European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 21 December 2016; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2016.182.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 6 7%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 25 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 20%
Computer Science 4 5%
Unspecified 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 26 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,913,605
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Human Genetics
#1,448
of 3,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,861
of 420,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Human Genetics
#15
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.