| Title |
Young people and the labour market
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic & Labour Market Review, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1057/elmr.2009.56 |
| Authors |
Catherine Barham, Annette Walling, Gareth Clancy, Stephen Hicks, Sarah Conn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 12 | 26% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,452,627
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Economic & Labour Market Review
#5
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,762
of 106,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic & Labour Market Review
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them