You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1210595110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey Sayer, Terry Sunderland, Jaboury Ghazoul, Jean-Laurent Pfund, Douglas Sheil, Erik Meijaard, Michelle Venter, Agni Klintuni Boedhihartono, Michael Day, Claude Garcia, Cora van Oosten, Louise E. Buck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 3 | 5% |
| Kenya | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 80% |
| Scientists | 10 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,495 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 1% |
| Brazil | 12 | <1% |
| Australia | 10 | <1% |
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Colombia | 5 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Kenya | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 33 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2386 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 491 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 447 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 411 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 170 | 7% |
| Other | 139 | 6% |
| Other | 370 | 15% |
| Unknown | 467 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 847 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 543 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 193 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 84 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 51 | 2% |
| Other | 179 | 7% |
| Unknown | 598 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 218. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#180,140
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#3,491
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,135
of 210,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#30
of 999 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 999 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.