↓ Skip to main content

Optimal mate choice patterns in pelagic copepods

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Optimal mate choice patterns in pelagic copepods
Published in
Oecologia, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00442-012-2516-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Heuschele, Sigrunn Eliassen, Thomas Kiørboe

Abstract

The importance of sexual selection for the evolution, dynamics and adaptation of organisms is well known for many species. However, the topic is rarely studied in marine plankton, the basis of the marine food web. Copepods show behaviors that suggest the existence of sexually selected traits, and recent laboratory experiments identified some selected morphological traits. Here, we use a 'life history-based' model of sex roles to determine the optimal choosiness behavior of male and female copepods for important copepod traits. Copepod females are predicted to be choosy at population densities typically occurring during the main breeding season, whereas males are not. The main drivers of this pattern are population density and the difference in non-receptive periods between males and females. This suggests that male reproductive traits have evolved mainly due to mate competition. The model can easily be parameterized for other planktonic organisms, and be used to plan experiments about sexual selection.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 4%
United States 2 4%
Canada 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 40 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 61%
Environmental Science 6 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 13%