| Title |
Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, August 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:scie.0000034384.35498.7d |
| Authors |
Olle Persson, Wolfgang Glänzel, Rickard Danell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Singapore | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 239 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 61 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 24% |
| Unknown | 46 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 74 | 28% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 22 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 22 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 17 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 21% |
| Unknown | 57 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#760
of 2,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,306
of 61,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.