↓ Skip to main content

The Heritability of Aptitude and Exceptional Talent Across Different Domains in Adolescents and Young Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 972)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
The Heritability of Aptitude and Exceptional Talent Across Different Domains in Adolescents and Young Adults
Published in
Behavior Genetics, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10519-009-9260-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna A. E. Vinkhuyzen, Sophie van der Sluis, Danielle Posthuma, Dorret I. Boomsma

Abstract

The origin of individual differences in aptitude, defined as a domain-specific skill within the normal ability range, and talent, defined as a domain specific skill of exceptional quality, is under debate. The nature of the variation in aptitudes and exceptional talents across different domains was investigated in a population based twin sample. Self-report data from 1,685 twin pairs (12-24 years) were analyzed for Music, Arts, Writing, Language, Chess, Mathematics, Sports, Memory, and Knowledge. The influence of shared environment was small for both aptitude and talent. Additive and non-additive genetic effects explained the major part of the substantial familial clustering in the aptitude measures with heritability estimates ranging between .32 and .71. Heritability estimates for talents were higher and ranged between .50 and .92. In general, the genetic architecture for aptitude and talent was similar in men and women. Genetic factors contribute to a large extent to variation in aptitude and talent across different domains of intellectual, creative, and sports abilities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 132 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Researcher 17 12%
Professor 6 4%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 28%
Sports and Recreations 15 11%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 5%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 28 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#819,781
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#36
of 972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,874
of 107,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them