| Title |
Assessment of Myocardial Fibrosis With Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathan Mewton, Chia Ying Liu, Pierre Croisille, David Bluemke, João A.C. Lima |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Peru | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Romania | 1 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 727 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 705 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 135 | 19% |
| Researcher | 118 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 61 | 8% |
| Other | 55 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 55 | 8% |
| Other | 168 | 23% |
| Unknown | 135 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 355 | 49% |
| Engineering | 59 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 21 | 3% |
| Other | 57 | 8% |
| Unknown | 167 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,187,222
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#4,589
of 16,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,893
of 197,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#14
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.