| Title |
Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aquatic Sciences, September 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00877430 |
| Authors |
Cajo J. F. ter Braak, Piet F. M. Verdonschot |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,761 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 1% |
| Brazil | 15 | <1% |
| Spain | 11 | <1% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| Canada | 7 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Mexico | 6 | <1% |
| South Africa | 6 | <1% |
| Portugal | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 48 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1626 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 351 | 20% |
| Researcher | 348 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 297 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 129 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 106 | 6% |
| Other | 287 | 16% |
| Unknown | 243 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 775 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 431 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 74 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 55 | 3% |
| Engineering | 13 | <1% |
| Other | 99 | 6% |
| Unknown | 314 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2003.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Sciences
#224
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,342
of 22,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Sciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them