↓ Skip to main content

Extrapolation methods for setting ecological standards for water quality: statistical and ecological concerns

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, September 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Extrapolation methods for setting ecological standards for water quality: statistical and ecological concerns
Published in
Ecotoxicology, September 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00116425
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric P. Smith, John Cairns

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Professor 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2010.
All research outputs
#2,682,842
of 24,208,207 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#70
of 1,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#743
of 20,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,208,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,522 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them