| Title |
Virgin olive oil supplementation and long-term cognition: the Predimed-Navarra randomized, trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12603-013-0027-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena H. Martinez-Lapiscina, P. Clavero, E. Toledo, B. San Julian, A. Sanchez-Tainta, D. Corella, R.M. Lamuela-Raventos, J.A. Martinez, M.Á. Martinez-Gonzalez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
| Finland | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 448 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 72 | 16% |
| Researcher | 59 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 88 | 19% |
| Unknown | 107 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 7% |
| Psychology | 29 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 72 | 16% |
| Unknown | 147 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#838,587
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#73
of 2,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,226
of 207,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.