↓ Skip to main content

Sampling technique is important for optimal isolation of pharyngeal gonorrhoea

Overview of attention for article published in Sexually Transmitted Infections, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sampling technique is important for optimal isolation of pharyngeal gonorrhoea
Published in
Sexually Transmitted Infections, May 2013
DOI 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051077
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Mitchell, V Rane, C K Fairley, D M Whiley, C S Bradshaw, M Bissessor, M Y Chen

Abstract

Culture is insensitive for the detection of pharyngeal gonorrhoea but isolation is pivotal to antimicrobial resistance surveillance. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether recommendations provided to clinicians (doctors and nurses) on pharyngeal swabbing technique could improve gonorrhoea detection rates and to determine which aspects of swabbing technique are important for optimal isolation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 27%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Mathematics 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,861,569
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Sexually Transmitted Infections
#2,971
of 3,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,556
of 201,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sexually Transmitted Infections
#39
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.