↓ Skip to main content

Temperature-dependent differences in foraging ability of two percids, Perca fluviatilis and Gymnocephalus cernuus

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Biology of Fishes, May 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Temperature-dependent differences in foraging ability of two percids, Perca fluviatilis and Gymnocephalus cernuus
Published in
Environmental Biology of Fishes, May 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00002736
Authors

Eva Bergman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 47 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Student > Master 9 18%
Other 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 63%
Environmental Science 14 27%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Unknown 4 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2017.
All research outputs
#4,726,418
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#251
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,448
of 11,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them