Title |
Feasibility and indicative results from a 12-month low-energy liquid diet treatment and maintenance programme for severe obesity
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp13x663073 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael Lean, Naomi Brosnahan, Philip McLoone, Louise McCombie, Anna Bell Higgs, Hazel Ross, Mhairi Mackenzie, Eleanor Grieve, Nick Finer, John Reckless, David Haslam, Billy Sloan, David Morrison |
Abstract |
There is no established primary care solution for the rapidly increasing numbers of severely obese people with body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m(2). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 120 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
Researcher | 19 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
Other | 31 | 26% |
Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
Psychology | 5 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,811,615
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#910
of 4,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,196
of 282,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.