↓ Skip to main content

Approaches to the study of urban ecosystems: The case of Central Arizona—Phoenix

Overview of attention for article published in Urban Ecosystems, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Approaches to the study of urban ecosystems: The case of Central Arizona—Phoenix
Published in
Urban Ecosystems, September 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:ueco.0000044036.59953.a1
Authors

Nancy B. Grimm, Charles L. Redman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 10%
Sweden 3 2%
Chile 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 142 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 33%
Researcher 35 20%
Student > Master 22 13%
Professor 17 10%
Other 8 5%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 15 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 62 35%
Social Sciences 35 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 26 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Urban Ecosystems
#431
of 898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,219
of 72,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urban Ecosystems
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.