| Title |
A case study for a cost-benefit-based, stepwise optimization of thermo-chemical WAS pre-treatment for anaerobic digestion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10163-016-0577-x |
| Authors |
Magdalena Nagler, Peter Aichinger, Martin Kuprian, Thomas Pümpel, Heribert Insam, Christian Ebner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2016.
All research outputs
#16,067,622
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
#141
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,376
of 425,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them