↓ Skip to main content

Non-healing ulcerative paronychia

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-healing ulcerative paronychia
Published in
The Lancet, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32400-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolyn Jack, Therese El Helou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 29%
Student > Postgraduate 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Psychology 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#39,448
of 42,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#319,869
of 422,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#380
of 433 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 433 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.