Title |
A survey of public perception and response to heat warnings across four North American cities: an evaluation of municipal effectiveness
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Biometeorology, September 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00484-006-0052-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Scott C. Sheridan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 2% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 176 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 24% |
Researcher | 33 | 18% |
Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 9% |
Unknown | 42 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 38 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 23 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 8% |
Engineering | 9 | 5% |
Psychology | 9 | 5% |
Other | 29 | 16% |
Unknown | 58 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 566. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2023.
All research outputs
#39,073
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biometeorology
#2
of 1,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30
of 70,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biometeorology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them