↓ Skip to main content

Rural Mothers’ Use of Formal Programs and Informal Social Supports to Meet Family Food Needs: A Mixed Methods Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Family and Economic Issues, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Rural Mothers’ Use of Formal Programs and Informal Social Supports to Meet Family Food Needs: A Mixed Methods Study
Published in
Journal of Family and Economic Issues, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10834-008-9127-6
Authors

Josephine A. Swanson, Christine M. Olson, Emily O. Miller, Frances C. Lawrence

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 25%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 30%
Psychology 7 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,926,100
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Family and Economic Issues
#166
of 362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,472
of 89,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Family and Economic Issues
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.