↓ Skip to main content

Optimal Management of Metastatic Melanoma: Current Strategies and Future Directions

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
14 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Optimal Management of Metastatic Melanoma: Current Strategies and Future Directions
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40257-013-0025-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Batus, Salman Waheed, Carl Ruby, Lindsay Petersen, Steven D. Bines, Howard L. Kaufman

Abstract

Melanoma is increasing in incidence and remains a major public health threat. Although the disease may be curable when identified early, advanced melanoma is characterized by widespread metastatic disease and a median survival of less than 10 months. In recent years, however, major advances in our understanding of the molecular nature of melanoma and the interaction of melanoma cells with the immune system have resulted in several new therapeutic strategies that are showing significant clinical benefit. Current therapeutic approaches include surgical resection of metastatic disease, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. Dacarbazine, interleukin-2, ipilimumab, and vemurafenib are now approved for the treatment of advanced melanoma. In addition, new combination chemotherapy regimens, monoclonal antibodies blocking the programmed death-1 (PD-1)/PD-ligand 1 pathway, and targeted therapy against CKIT, mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK), and other putative signaling pathways in melanoma are beginning to show promise in early-phase clinical trials. Further research on these modalities alone and in combination will likely be the focus of future clinical investigation and may impact the outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 21%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 37 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 5%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 38 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,939,902
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#131
of 1,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,764
of 196,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.