↓ Skip to main content

Combined and Interactive Effects of Environmental and GWAS-Identified Risk Factors in Ovarian Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined and Interactive Effects of Environmental and GWAS-Identified Risk Factors in Ovarian Cancer
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, May 2013
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-1030-t
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celeste Leigh Pearce, Mary Anne Rossing, Alice W. Lee, Roberta B. Ness, Penelope M. Webb, for Australian Cancer Study, and Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Susan M. Jordan, Douglas A. Stram, Jenny Chang-Claude, Rebecca Hein, Stefan Nickels, Galina Lurie, Pamela J. Thompson, Michael E. Carney, Marc T. Goodman, Kirsten Moysich, Estrid Hogdall, Allan Jensen, Ellen L. Goode, Brooke L. Fridley, Julie M. Cunningham, Robert A. Vierkant, Rachel Palmieri Weber, Argyrios Ziogas, Hoda Anton-Culver, Simon A. Gayther, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Usha Menon, Susan J. Ramus, Louise Brinton, Nicolas Wentzensen, Jolanta Lissowska, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Leon F.A.G. Massuger, Lambertus A.L.M. Kiemeney, Anne M. Van Altena, Katja K.H. Aben, Andrew Berchuck, Jennifer A. Doherty, Edwin Iversen, Valerie McGuire, Patricia G. Moorman, Paul Pharoah, Malcolm C. Pike, Harvey Risch, Weiva Sieh, Daniel O. Stram, Kathryn L. Terry, Alice Whittemore, Anna H. Wu, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Susanne K. Kjaer, for the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Abstract

There are several well-established environmental risk factors for ovarian cancer, and recent genome-wide association studies have also identified six variants that influence disease risk. However, the interplay between such risk factors and susceptibility loci has not been studied.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 27%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Professor 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2013.
All research outputs
#1,226,194
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#402
of 4,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,492
of 205,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#13
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.